Volume, not production
DK Metcalf has 34% of PIT's air yards but is scoring 3.8 PPR points a game below what that usage usually produces.
- Air-yards share
- 34%
- Targets
- 33
- PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
- −3.8
Weeks 1–4 · 4 games
Usage comparison · Wide receivers
DK Metcalf vs Parker Washington
Parker Washington gets more of his team's passes (30% vs 23%) and more of the deep throws (45% of its air yards vs 34%). In total, though, DK Metcalf has more targets (33 vs 23). DK Metcalf has played 4 games and Parker Washington 3 games. Near the end zone, Parker Washington has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (12% vs 4%). Parker Washington is scoring more fantasy points a game (16.4 vs 10.8, PPR), but the chances DK Metcalf gets usually score more: 14.7 vs 14.6 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 2, 2026
WRPIT
DK Metcalf- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 10.8
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 14.7
4 games with a target, carry or dropback
WRJAX
Parker Washington- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 16.4
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 14.6
3 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
| Stat | DK Metcalf | Parker Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 4 | 3 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 33 | 23 |
| Target share | 23% | 30% |
| Air-yards share | 34% | 45% |
| Catches | 16 | 15 |
| Receiving yards | 213 | 221 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 1 | 3 |
| Red-zone share | 4% | 12% |
| End-zone targets | 2 | 3 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 10.8 | 16.4 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 43.3 | 49.1 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 14.7 | 14.6 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | −3.8 | +1.8 |
Week by week
Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
- DK Metcalf
- Parker Washington
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | DK Metcalf | Parker Washington |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27%against ATL | 29%against CLE |
| 2 | 24%against NE | 43%against DEN |
| 3 | 16%against CIN | 19%against NE |
| 4 | 23%against CLE | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
| Leaderboard | DK Metcalf | Parker Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | #29of 76 wide receivers | #4of 76 wide receivers |
| Air-yards share leaders | #20of 76 wide receivers | #7of 76 wide receivers |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #20of 36 wide receivers |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #72of 166 wide receivers | #33of 166 wide receivers |
| End-zone target leaders | #24of 166 wide receivers | #16of 166 wide receivers |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #16of 166 wide receivers | #17of 166 wide receivers |
Talking points
Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.
DK Metcalf
Parker Washington
Role down
Parker Washington's target share fell to 19% in week 3 (5 targets), from 37% in weeks 1-2.
- Target share, week 3
- 19%
- Targets, week 3
- 5
- Target share, weeks 1–2
- 37%
- Targets, weeks 1–2
- 18
Weeks 1–3 · 3 games
- Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.
Keep exploring
DK Metcalf
More comparisons
Parker Washington
More comparisons