Usage comparison · Tight ends

Colston Loveland vs Mike Gesicki

Colston Loveland gets more of his team's passes (15% vs 11%), while Mike Gesicki gets more of the deep throws (15% of his team's air yards vs 13%). Colston Loveland has played 6 games and Mike Gesicki 4 games. Near the end zone, Colston Loveland has had more chances (9 vs 4 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 8%). Mike Gesicki is scoring more fantasy points a game (13.0 vs 7.1, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 9.2 vs 9.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

TECHI

Colston Loveland
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.1
Expected points per gameEst.
9.1

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

TECIN

Mike Gesicki
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
13.0
Expected points per gameEst.
9.2

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Colston Loveland and Mike Gesicki, season usage side by side
StatColston LovelandMike Gesicki
Games64
Passes thrown to him
Targets3017
Target share15%11%
Air-yards share13%15%
Catches1912
Receiving yards175159
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances94
Red-zone share9%8%
End-zone targets43
Touchdowns
Touchdowns14
Expected touchdownsEst.2.62.2
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)7.113.0
Fantasy points (PPR)42.551.9
Expected points per gameEst.9.19.2
Points vs expectedEst.−2.1+3.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Colston Loveland
  • Mike Gesicki

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekColston LovelandMike Gesicki
18%against CAR21%against TB
210%against MIN— no game with a target, carry or dropback
312%against PHI8%against PIT
429%against NYJ9%against JAX
513%against GB6%against MIA
621%against ATL— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Colston Loveland and Mike Gesicki
LeaderboardColston LovelandMike Gesicki
Target share leaders#19of 47 tight ends#34of 47 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#16of 47 tight ends#11of 47 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders#20of 35 tight ends#23of 35 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#2of 104 tight ends#25of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#6of 104 tight ends#14of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#15of 104 tight ends#14of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Colston Loveland

Touchdowns below usage

Colston Loveland has scored 1 touchdown on opportunities that usually produce 2.6, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
1
Expected touchdownsEst.
2.6
Expected PPR per gameEst.
9.1
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−2.1

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Mike Gesicki

Touchdowns above usage

Mike Gesicki has scored 4 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 2.2, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
4
Expected touchdownsEst.
2.2
Expected PPR per gameEst.
9.2
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+3.8

Weeks 1 and 3–5 · 4 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring