Usage comparison · Tight ends

Colby Parkinson vs Josh Cuevas

Josh Cuevas gets more of his team's passes (10% vs 7%) and more of the deep throws (8% of its air yards vs 2%). In total, though, Colby Parkinson has more targets (13 vs 8). Colby Parkinson has played 5 games and Josh Cuevas 3 games. Near the end zone, Colby Parkinson has had more chances (5 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 3%). Josh Cuevas is scoring more fantasy points a game (7.1 vs 4.1, PPR), but the chances Colby Parkinson gets usually score more: 4.9 vs 4.8 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

TELA

Colby Parkinson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
4.1
Expected points per gameEst.
4.9

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEBALRookie

Josh Cuevas
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.1
Expected points per gameEst.
4.8

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Colby Parkinson and Josh Cuevas, season usage side by side
StatColby ParkinsonJosh Cuevas
Games53
Passes thrown to him
Targets138
Target share7%10%
Air-yards share2%8%
Catches97
Receiving yards5584
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances51
Red-zone share10%3%
End-zone targets01
Touchdowns
Touchdowns11
Expected touchdownsEst.1.40.6
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)4.17.1
Fantasy points (PPR)20.521.4
Expected points per gameEst.4.94.8
Points vs expectedEst.−0.8+2.3

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Colby Parkinson
  • Josh Cuevas

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekColby ParkinsonJosh Cuevas
17%against SF— no game with a target, carry or dropback
27%against NYG— no game with a target, carry or dropback
32%against DEN5%against DAL
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
54%against BUF6%against ATL
619%against ARI16%against CLE

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Colby Parkinson and Josh Cuevas
LeaderboardColby ParkinsonJosh Cuevas
Target share leaders#43of 47 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#46of 47 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders#16of 35 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#11of 104 tight ends#65of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#67of 104 tight ends#40of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#45of 104 tight ends#46of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Colby Parkinson

Role up

Colby Parkinson's target share rose to 19% in week 6 (6 targets), from 4% in weeks 1-5.

Target share, week 6
19%
Targets, week 6
6
Target share, weeks 1–3 and 5
4%
Targets, weeks 1–3 and 5
7

Weeks 1–3 and 5–6 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Josh Cuevas

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring