Usage comparison · Tight ends

Colby Parkinson vs Evan Engram

Evan Engram gets more of his team's passes (11% vs 7%) and more of the deep throws (11% of its air yards vs 2%). Colby Parkinson has played 5 games and Evan Engram 6 games. Near the end zone, Colby Parkinson has had more chances (5 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 4%). Evan Engram is scoring more fantasy points a game (5.2 vs 4.1, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 5.2 vs 4.9 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

TELA

Colby Parkinson

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 4.1
Expected points per gameEst.: 4.9

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEDEN

Evan Engram

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 5.2
Expected points per gameEst.: 5.2

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Colby Parkinson and Evan Engram, season usage side by side
Stat	Colby Parkinson	Evan Engram
Games	5	6
Passes thrown to him
Targets	13	19
Target share	7%	11%
Air-yards share	2%	11%
Catches	9	12
Receiving yards	55	134
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	5	2
Red-zone share	10%	4%
End-zone targets	0	1
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	1	1
Expected touchdownsEst.	1.4	0.8
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	4.1	5.2
Fantasy points (PPR)	20.5	31.4
Expected points per gameEst.	4.9	5.2
Points vs expectedEst.	−0.8	0.0

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

Colby Parkinson
Evan Engram

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	Colby Parkinson	Evan Engram
1	7%against SF	19%against KC
2	7%against NYG	3%against JAX
3	2%against DEN	6%against LA
4	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	13%against SF
5	4%against BUF	18%against LAC
6	19%against ARI	8%against SEA

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Colby Parkinson and Evan Engram
Leaderboard	Colby Parkinson	Evan Engram
Target share leaders	#43of 47 tight ends	#33of 47 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders	#46of 47 tight ends	#24of 47 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders	#16of 35 tight ends	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#11of 104 tight ends	#40of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders	#67of 104 tight ends	#34of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#45of 104 tight ends	#43of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Colby Parkinson

Role up

Colby Parkinson's target share rose to 19% in week 6 (6 targets), from 4% in weeks 1-5.

Target share, week 6: 19%
Targets, week 6: 6
Target share, weeks 1–3 and 5: 4%
Targets, weeks 1–3 and 5: 7

Weeks 1–3 and 5–6 · 5 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Evan Engram

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Colby Parkinson

More comparisons

Evan Engram

More comparisons

Compare two other players →