Usage comparison · Wide receivers

CeeDee Lamb vs Nico Collins

Nico Collins gets more of his team's passes (29% vs 27%), while CeeDee Lamb gets more of the deep throws (37% of his team's air yards vs 33%). In total, though, CeeDee Lamb has more targets (51 vs 18). CeeDee Lamb has played 5 games and Nico Collins 2 games. Near the end zone, CeeDee Lamb has had more chances (6 vs 3 plays within 20 yards), but Nico Collins gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (23% vs 11%). Nico Collins is scoring more fantasy points a game (26.0 vs 23.0, PPR), but the chances CeeDee Lamb gets usually score more: 18.6 vs 18.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 9, 2026

WRDAL

CeeDee Lamb
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
23.0
Expected points per gameEst.
18.6

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRHOU

Nico Collins
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
26.0
Expected points per gameEst.
18.1

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
CeeDee Lamb and Nico Collins, season usage side by side
StatCeeDee LambNico Collins
Games52
Passes thrown to him
Targets5118
Target share27%29%
Air-yards share37%33%
Catches3914
Receiving yards507193
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances63
Red-zone share11%23%
End-zone targets53
Touchdowns
Touchdowns43
Expected touchdownsEst.3.11.7
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)23.026.0
Fantasy points (PPR)115.152.0
Expected points per gameEst.18.618.1
Points vs expectedEst.+4.1+7.9

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • CeeDee Lamb
  • Nico Collins

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekCeeDee LambNico Collins
127%against NYG27%against BUF
229%against WAS— no game with a target, carry or dropback
320%against BAL— no game with a target, carry or dropback
449%against HOU31%against DAL
512%against TB— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for CeeDee Lamb and Nico Collins
LeaderboardCeeDee LambNico Collins
Target share leaders#11of 98 wide receivers#7of 98 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#16of 98 wide receivers#24of 98 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders#24of 47 wide receivers#1of 47 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#6of 174 wide receivers#47of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#3of 174 wide receivers#25of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#7of 174 wide receivers#8of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

CeeDee Lamb

Role down

CeeDee Lamb's target share fell to 12% in week 5 (5 targets), from 32% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
12%
Targets, week 5
5
Target share, weeks 1–4
32%
Targets, weeks 1–4
46

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Nico Collins

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring