Rookie role
Rookie Caleb Douglas has a 20% target share through 2 games.
- Target share
- 20%
- Targets
- 10
Weeks 1–2 · 2 games
Usage comparison · Wide receivers
Caleb Douglas vs Ted Hurst III
Caleb Douglas gets more of his team's passes (20% vs 14%), while Ted Hurst III gets more of the deep throws (26% of his team's air yards vs 24%). In total, though, Ted Hurst III has more targets (22 vs 10). Caleb Douglas has played 2 games and Ted Hurst III 5 games. Near the end zone, Ted Hurst III has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (8% vs 7%). Caleb Douglas is scoring more fantasy points a game (9.2 vs 6.8, PPR), but the chances Ted Hurst III gets usually score more: 8.3 vs 8.2 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026
WRMIARookie
Caleb Douglas- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 9.2
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 8.2
2 games with a target, carry or dropback
WRTBRookie
Ted Hurst III- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 6.8
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 8.3
5 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
| Stat | Caleb Douglas | Ted Hurst III |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2 | 5 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 10 | 22 |
| Target share | 20% | 14% |
| Air-yards share | 24% | 26% |
| Catches | 7 | 11 |
| Receiving yards | 113 | 168 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 1 | 3 |
| Red-zone share | 7% | 8% |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 3 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 18.3 | 33.8 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +0.9 | −1.6 |
Week by week
Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
- Caleb Douglas
- Ted Hurst III
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Caleb Douglas | Ted Hurst III |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26%against LV | 11%against CIN |
| 2 | 13%against SF | 21%against CLE |
| 3 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 9%against MIN |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 12%against GB |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 6 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 15%against PIT |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
| Leaderboard | Caleb Douglas | Ted Hurst III |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | #39of 109 wide receivers | #70of 109 wide receivers |
| Air-yards share leaders | #51of 109 wide receivers | #39of 109 wide receivers |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #53of 74 wide receivers |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #104of 187 wide receivers | #73of 187 wide receivers |
| End-zone target leaders | #119of 187 wide receivers | #39of 187 wide receivers |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #63of 187 wide receivers | #62of 187 wide receivers |
Talking points
Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.
Caleb Douglas
Ted Hurst III
No talking points for him in this week's report.
Keep exploring
Caleb Douglas
More comparisons