Usage comparison · Tight ends

Cade Otton vs Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews gets more of his team's passes (25% vs 18%) and more of the deep throws (17% of its air yards vs 14%). Near the end zone, Cade Otton has had more chances (2 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 3%). Mark Andrews is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.4 vs 7.7, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 9.1 vs 8.9 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–3 · Updated Sep 29, 2026

TETB

Cade Otton
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.7
Expected points per gameEst.
8.9

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEBAL

Mark Andrews
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.4
Expected points per gameEst.
9.1

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Cade Otton and Mark Andrews, season usage side by side
StatCade OttonMark Andrews
Games33
Passes thrown to him
Targets1718
Target share18%25%
Air-yards share14%17%
Catches1113
Receiving yards120122
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances21
Red-zone share9%3%
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.20.1
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)7.78.4
Fantasy points (PPR)23.025.2
Expected points per gameEst.8.99.1
Points vs expectedEst.−1.3−0.7

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Cade Otton
  • Mark Andrews
Target share by week
WeekCade OttonMark Andrews
119%against CIN25%against IND
218%against CLE24%against NO
317%against MIN25%against DAL

Next to each number: that week's opponent.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Cade Otton and Mark Andrews
LeaderboardCade OttonMark Andrews
Target share leaders#11of 29 tight ends#3of 29 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#10of 29 tight ends#8of 29 tight ends
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#15of 93 tight ends#46of 93 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#42of 93 tight ends#76of 93 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#16of 93 tight ends#15of 93 tight ends

Keep exploring