Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Adonai Mitchell vs Drake London

Drake London gets more of his team's passes (29% vs 25%), while Adonai Mitchell gets more of the deep throws (56% of his team's air yards vs 44%). Adonai Mitchell has played 2 games and Drake London 6 games. Near the end zone, Drake London has had more chances (2 vs 1 plays within 20 yards), but Adonai Mitchell gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (7% vs 4%). Drake London is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.7 vs 10.7, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 13.3 vs 12.9 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 23, 2026

WRNYJ

Adonai Mitchell
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.7
Expected points per gameEst.
12.9

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRATL

Drake London
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.7
Expected points per gameEst.
13.3

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 6. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Adonai Mitchell and Drake London, season usage side by side
StatAdonai MitchellDrake London
Games26
Passes thrown to him
Targets1546
Target share25%29%
Air-yards share56%44%
Catches931
Receiving yards123550
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances12
Red-zone share7%4%
End-zone targets02
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.51.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)10.714.7
Fantasy points (PPR)21.388.4
Expected points per gameEst.12.913.3
Points vs expectedEst.−2.2+1.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Adonai Mitchell
  • Drake London

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekAdonai MitchellDrake London
113%against TEN21%against PIT
233%against GB16%against CAR
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback43%against GB
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback30%against NO
5— no game with a target, carry or dropback32%against BAL
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback30%against CHI
7— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Adonai Mitchell and Drake London
LeaderboardAdonai MitchellDrake London
Target share leaders#18of 109 wide receivers#8of 109 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#1of 109 wide receivers#6of 109 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#98of 188 wide receivers#83of 188 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#111of 188 wide receivers#48of 188 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#28of 188 wide receivers#26of 188 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Adonai Mitchell

Role up

Adonai Mitchell's target share rose to 33% in week 2 (12 targets), from 13% in week 1.

Target share, week 2
33%
Targets, week 2
12
Target share, week 1
13%
Targets, week 1
3

Weeks 1–2 · 2 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Drake London

Touchdowns below usage

Drake London has scored 0 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 1.5, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
0
Expected touchdownsEst.
1.5
Expected PPR per gameEst.
13.3
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+1.1

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring