Usage comparison · Tight ends

Sam LaPorta vs T.J. Hockenson

T.J. Hockenson gets more of his team's passes (26% vs 20%) and more of the deep throws (23% of its air yards vs 15%). In total, though, Sam LaPorta has more targets (32 vs 26). Near the end zone, Sam LaPorta has had more chances (9 vs 5 plays within 20 yards), but T.J. Hockenson gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (21% vs 16%). Sam LaPorta is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.2 vs 11.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 15.3 vs 10.9 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

TEDET

Sam LaPorta
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.2
Expected points per gameEst.
15.3

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEMIN

T.J. Hockenson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
11.9
Expected points per gameEst.
10.9

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Sam LaPorta and T.J. Hockenson, season usage side by side
StatSam LaPortaT.J. Hockenson
Games44
Passes thrown to him
Targets3226
Target share20%26%
Air-yards share15%23%
Catches2222
Receiving yards228195
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances95
Red-zone share16%21%
End-zone targets51
Touchdowns
Touchdowns21
Expected touchdownsEst.3.31.1
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)14.211.9
Fantasy points (PPR)56.847.5
Expected points per gameEst.15.310.9
Points vs expectedEst.−1.1+1.0

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Sam LaPorta
  • T.J. Hockenson
Target share by week
WeekSam LaPortaT.J. Hockenson
121%against NO22%against GB
218%against BUF21%against CHI
313%against NYJ16%against TB
425%against CAR39%against MIA

Next to each number: that week's opponent.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Sam LaPorta and T.J. Hockenson
LeaderboardSam LaPortaT.J. Hockenson
Target share leaders#7of 34 tight ends#4of 34 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#11of 34 tight ends#4of 34 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders#6of 21 tight ends#2of 21 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#1of 96 tight ends#8of 96 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#1of 96 tight ends#36of 96 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#3of 96 tight ends#6of 96 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Sam LaPorta

No talking points for him in this week's report.

T.J. Hockenson

Role up

T.J. Hockenson's target share rose to 39% in week 4 (13 targets), from 19% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
39%
Targets, week 4
13
Target share, weeks 1–3
19%
Targets, weeks 1–3
13

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring