Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Rashee Rice vs Roman Wilson

Rashee Rice gets more of his team's passes (19% vs 14%), while Roman Wilson gets more of the deep throws (24% of his team's air yards vs 23%). In total, though, Roman Wilson has more targets (25 vs 17). Rashee Rice has played 3 games and Roman Wilson 5 games. Near the end zone, Rashee Rice has had more chances (4 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 7%). Rashee Rice is scoring more fantasy points a game (12.7 vs 9.0, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 9.0 vs 8.9 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

WRKC

Rashee Rice

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 12.7
Expected points per gameEst.: 9.0

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRPIT

Roman Wilson

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 9.0
Expected points per gameEst.: 8.9

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Rashee Rice and Roman Wilson, season usage side by side
Stat	Rashee Rice	Roman Wilson
Games	3	5
Passes thrown to him
Targets	17	25
Target share	19%	14%
Air-yards share	23%	24%
Catches	13	14
Receiving yards	190	188
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	4	2
Red-zone share	10%	7%
End-zone targets	0	2
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	1	2
Expected touchdownsEst.	0.3	1.1
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	12.7	9.0
Fantasy points (PPR)	38.0	44.8
Expected points per gameEst.	9.0	8.9
Points vs expectedEst.	+3.6	+0.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

Rashee Rice
Roman Wilson

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	Rashee Rice	Roman Wilson
1	8%against DEN	16%against ATL
2	14%against IND	16%against NE
3	39%against MIA	19%against CIN
4	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	15%against CLE
5	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	3%against IND

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Rashee Rice and Roman Wilson
Leaderboard	Rashee Rice	Roman Wilson
Target share leaders	#43of 103 wide receivers	#66of 103 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders	#50of 103 wide receivers	#45of 103 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders	#33of 59 wide receivers	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#41of 180 wide receivers	#79of 180 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders	#166of 180 wide receivers	#52of 180 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#54of 180 wide receivers	#56of 180 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Rashee Rice

Role up

Rashee Rice's target share rose to 39% in week 3 (9 targets), from 12% in weeks 1-2.

Target share, week 3: 39%
Targets, week 3: 9
Target share, weeks 1–2: 12%
Targets, weeks 1–2: 8

Weeks 1–3 · 3 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Roman Wilson

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Rashee Rice

More comparisons

Roman Wilson

More comparisons

Compare two other players →