Usage comparison · Tight ends

Mike Gesicki vs Noah Fant

Mike Gesicki gets more of his team's passes (14% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (20% of its air yards vs 8%). In total, though, Noah Fant has more targets (12 vs 10). Near the end zone, Noah Fant has had more chances (3 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (12% vs 10%). Noah Fant is scoring more fantasy points a game (16.3 vs 15.8, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 10.8 vs 10.7 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–3 · Updated Sep 29, 2026

TECIN

Mike Gesicki

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 15.8
Expected points per gameEst.: 10.7

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

TENO

Noah Fant

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 16.3
Expected points per gameEst.: 10.8

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Mike Gesicki and Noah Fant, season usage side by side
Stat	Mike Gesicki	Noah Fant
Games	2	2
Passes thrown to him
Targets	10	12
Target share	14%	13%
Air-yards share	20%	8%
Catches	8	8
Receiving yards	115	66
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	2	3
Red-zone share	10%	12%
End-zone targets	1	2
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	2	3
Expected touchdownsEst.	1.3	1.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	15.8	16.3
Fantasy points (PPR)	31.5	32.6
Expected points per gameEst.	10.7	10.8
Points vs expectedEst.	+5.1	+5.5

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

Mike Gesicki
Noah Fant

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	Mike Gesicki	Noah Fant
1	21%against TB	15%against DET
2	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	— no game with a target, carry or dropback
3	8%against PIT	10%against LV

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Mike Gesicki and Noah Fant
Leaderboard	Mike Gesicki	Noah Fant
Target share leaders	#19of 29 tight ends	#23of 29 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders	#6of 29 tight ends	#23of 29 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)	#6of 12 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#25of 93 tight ends	#12of 93 tight ends
End-zone target leaders	#27of 93 tight ends	#13of 93 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#10of 93 tight ends	#9of 93 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Mike Gesicki

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Noah Fant

Touchdowns above usage

Noah Fant has scored 3 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 1.0, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns: 3
Expected touchdownsEst.: 1.0
Expected PPR per gameEst.: 10.8
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.: +5.5

Weeks 1 and 3 · 2 games

Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring

Mike Gesicki

More comparisons

Noah Fant

More comparisons

Compare two other players →