Usage comparison · Running backs
Tank Bigsby gets more of his team's runs (27% vs 10%), while Kimani Vidal gets more of his team's passes (9% vs 4%). Kimani Vidal has played 2 games and Tank Bigsby 4 games. Near the end zone, Tank Bigsby has had more chances (5 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (14% vs 10%). Kimani Vidal is scoring more fantasy points a game (7.3 vs 4.3, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 6.2 vs 5.7 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 6, 2026
RBLAC
Kimani Vidal2 games with a target, carry or dropback
RBPHI
Tank Bigsby4 games with a target, carry or dropback
| Stat | Kimani Vidal | Tank Bigsby |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2 | 4 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 6 | 4 |
| Target share | 9% | 4% |
| Catches | 3 | 3 |
| Receiving yards | 25 | 10 |
| Runs | ||
| Carries | 6 | 28 |
| Carry share | 10% | 27% |
| Rushing yards | 31 | 91 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 2 | 5 |
| Red-zone share | 10% | 14% |
| Goal-line runs | 0 | 1 |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.3 | 0.9 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 7.3 | 4.3 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 14.6 | 17.1 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 6.2 | 5.7 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +1.1 | −0.9 |
Carry share by week
Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Kimani Vidal | Tank Bigsby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 4%against WAS |
| 2 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 41%against TEN |
| 3 | 4%against BUF | 0%against CHI |
| 4 | 16%against SEA | 52%against LA |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Leaderboard | Kimani Vidal | Tank Bigsby |
|---|---|---|
| Carry share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games) | #45of 66 running backs |
| Target share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #48of 57 running backs |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #64of 108 running backs | #46of 108 running backs |
| Goal-line carry leaders | #83of 108 running backs | #48of 108 running backs |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #54of 108 running backs | #55of 108 running backs |
No talking points for him in this week's report.
Role up
Weeks 1–4 · 4 games
Kimani Vidal
More comparisons