Usage comparison · Running backs

Jonah Coleman vs Tony Pollard

Tony Pollard gets more of his team's runs (59% vs 36%), while Jonah Coleman gets more of his team's passes (10% vs 9%). In total, though, Tony Pollard has more targets (7 vs 3). Jonah Coleman has played 1 game and Tony Pollard 3 games. Near the end zone, Tony Pollard has had more chances (8 vs 3 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (31% vs 21%). Jonah Coleman is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.8 vs 8.5, PPR), but the chances Tony Pollard gets usually score more: 11.6 vs 11.0 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 2, 2026

RBDENRookie

Jonah Coleman
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.8
Expected points per gameEst.
11.0

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

RBTEN

Tony Pollard
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.5
Expected points per gameEst.
11.6

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Jonah Coleman and Tony Pollard, season usage side by side
StatJonah ColemanTony Pollard
Games13
Passes thrown to him
Targets37
Target share10%9%
Catches36
Receiving yards1922
Runs
Carries1038
Carry share36%59%
Rushing yards39173
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances38
Red-zone share21%31%
Goal-line runs12
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns10
Expected touchdownsEst.0.51.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)14.88.5
Fantasy points (PPR)14.825.5
Expected points per gameEst.11.011.6
Points vs expectedEst.+3.8−3.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Carry share by week

Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.

  • Jonah Coleman
  • Tony Pollard

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Carry share by week
WeekJonah ColemanTony Pollard
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback50%against NYJ
236%against JAX48%against PHI
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback81%against NYG
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Jonah Coleman and Tony Pollard
LeaderboardJonah ColemanTony Pollard
Carry share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games)#16of 62 running backs
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#20of 52 running backs
Red-zone opportunity leaders#49of 104 running backs#21of 104 running backs
Goal-line carry leaders#32of 104 running backs#24of 104 running backs
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#27of 104 running backs#26of 104 running backs

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Jonah Coleman

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Tony Pollard

Role up

Tony Pollard's share of TEN carries rose to 81% in week 3 (17 carries), from 49% in weeks 1-2.

Carry share, week 3
81%
Carries, week 3
17
Carry share, weeks 1–2
49%

Weeks 1–3 · 3 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Touchdowns below usage

Tony Pollard has scored 0 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 1.5, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
0
Expected touchdownsEst.
1.5
Expected PPR per gameEst.
11.6
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−3.1

Weeks 1–3 · 3 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring