Usage comparison · Running backs
Dylan Sampson vs Kimani Vidal
Dylan Sampson gets more of his team's runs (21% vs 18%), while Kimani Vidal gets more of his team's passes (10% vs 9%). In total, though, Kimani Vidal has more carries (21 vs 6). Dylan Sampson has played 1 game and Kimani Vidal 4 games. Near the end zone, Kimani Vidal has had more chances (4 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (13% vs 0%). Dylan Sampson is scoring more fantasy points a game (10.7 vs 8.6, PPR), but the chances Kimani Vidal gets usually score more: 7.1 vs 7.0 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026
RBCLE
Dylan Sampson- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 10.7
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 7.0
1 game with a target, carry or dropback
RBLAC
Kimani Vidal- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 8.6
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 7.1
4 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
| Stat | Dylan Sampson | Kimani Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 4 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 3 | 12 |
| Target share | 9% | 10% |
| Catches | 3 | 7 |
| Receiving yards | 32 | 43 |
| Runs | ||
| Carries | 6 | 21 |
| Carry share | 21% | 18% |
| Rushing yards | 45 | 109 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 0 | 4 |
| Red-zone share | 0% | 13% |
| Goal-line runs | 0 | 0 |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 10.7 | 8.6 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 10.7 | 34.2 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 7.0 | 7.1 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +3.7 | +1.4 |
Week by week
Carry share by week
Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.
- Dylan Sampson
- Kimani Vidal
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Dylan Sampson | Kimani Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 2 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 3 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 4%against BUF |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 16%against SEA |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 24%against DEN |
| 6 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 32%against KC |
| 7 | 21%against TEN | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
| Leaderboard | Dylan Sampson | Kimani Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| Carry share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games) | #62of 82 running backs |
| Target share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | #26of 50 running backs |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #66of 78 running backs |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #116of 129 running backs | #70of 129 running backs |
| Goal-line carry leaders | #86of 129 running backs | #103of 129 running backs |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #55of 129 running backs | #54of 129 running backs |
Keep exploring
Dylan Sampson
More comparisons