Usage comparison · Running backs
Alec Ingold vs Kimani Vidal
Kimani Vidal gets more of the Chargers' runs (18% vs 0%), while Alec Ingold gets more of the Chargers' passes (12% vs 10%). In total, though, Kimani Vidal has more targets (12 vs 4). Alec Ingold has played 1 game and Kimani Vidal 4 games. Near the end zone, Kimani Vidal has had more chances (4 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of the Chargers' chances there (13% vs 7%). Kimani Vidal is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.6 vs 6.5, PPR), but the chances Alec Ingold gets usually score more: 7.2 vs 7.1 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026
RBLAC
Alec Ingold- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 6.5
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 7.2
1 game with a target, carry or dropback
RBLAC
Kimani Vidal- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 8.6
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 7.1
4 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
| Stat | Alec Ingold | Kimani Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 4 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 4 | 12 |
| Target share | 12% | 10% |
| Catches | 3 | 7 |
| Receiving yards | 35 | 43 |
| Runs | ||
| Carries | 0 | 21 |
| Carry share | 0% | 18% |
| Rushing yards | 0 | 109 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 1 | 4 |
| Red-zone share | 7% | 13% |
| Goal-line runs | 0 | 0 |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 6.5 | 8.6 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 6.5 | 34.2 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 7.2 | 7.1 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | −0.7 | +1.4 |
Week by week
Carry share by week
Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.
- Alec Ingold
- Kimani Vidal
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Alec Ingold | Kimani Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 2 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 3 | 0%against BUF | 4%against BUF |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 16%against SEA |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 24%against DEN |
| 6 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 32%against KC |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
| Leaderboard | Alec Ingold | Kimani Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| Carry share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games) | #61of 78 running backs |
| Target share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | #24of 47 running backs |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #62of 73 running backs |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #89of 118 running backs | #62of 118 running backs |
| Goal-line carry leaders | #67of 118 running backs | #95of 118 running backs |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #50of 118 running backs | #53of 118 running backs |
Keep exploring
Alec Ingold
More comparisons