Usage comparison · Tight ends

David Njoku vs Greg Dulcich

David Njoku gets more of his team's passes (15% vs 14%) and more of the deep throws (10% of its air yards vs 8%). In total, though, Greg Dulcich has more targets (12 vs 8). David Njoku has played 2 games and Greg Dulcich 3 games. Near the end zone, Greg Dulcich has had more chances (2 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (11% vs 7%). David Njoku is scoring more fantasy points a game (6.4 vs 6.0, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 6.4 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–3 · Updated Sep 29, 2026

TELAC

David Njoku

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 6.4
Expected points per gameEst.: 6.4

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEMIA

Greg Dulcich

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 6.0
Expected points per gameEst.: 6.4

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

David Njoku and Greg Dulcich, season usage side by side
Stat	David Njoku	Greg Dulcich
Games	2	3
Passes thrown to him
Targets	8	12
Target share	15%	14%
Air-yards share	10%	8%
Catches	6	9
Receiving yards	67	90
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	1	2
Red-zone share	7%	11%
End-zone targets	0	0
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	0	0
Expected touchdownsEst.	0.2	0.4
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	6.4	6.0
Fantasy points (PPR)	12.7	18.0
Expected points per gameEst.	6.4	6.4
Points vs expectedEst.	0.0	−0.4

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

David Njoku
Greg Dulcich

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	David Njoku	Greg Dulcich
1	19%against ARI	7%against LV
2	12%against LV	13%against SF
3	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	20%against KC

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for David Njoku and Greg Dulcich
Leaderboard	David Njoku	Greg Dulcich
Target share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)	#18of 29 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)	#22of 29 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#36of 93 tight ends	#21of 93 tight ends
End-zone target leaders	#52of 93 tight ends	#60of 93 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#26of 93 tight ends	#27of 93 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

David Njoku

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Greg Dulcich

Role up

Greg Dulcich's target share rose to 20% in week 3 (7 targets), from 10% in weeks 1-2.

Target share, week 3: 20%
Targets, week 3: 7
Target share, weeks 1–2: 10%
Targets, weeks 1–2: 5

Weeks 1–3 · 3 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

David Njoku

More comparisons

Greg Dulcich

More comparisons

Compare two other players →