Usage comparison · Tight ends

Chig Okonkwo vs Kyle Pitts

Chig Okonkwo gets more of his team's passes (15% vs 14%), while Kyle Pitts gets more of the deep throws (12% of his team's air yards vs 11%). In total, though, Kyle Pitts has more targets (22 vs 13). Chig Okonkwo has played 3 games and Kyle Pitts 6 games. Near the end zone, Kyle Pitts has had more chances (5 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (11% vs 0%). Kyle Pitts is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.3 vs 5.4, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 6.7 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

TEWAS

Chig Okonkwo

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 5.4
Expected points per gameEst.: 6.7

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEATL

Kyle Pitts

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 8.3
Expected points per gameEst.: 6.7

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Chig Okonkwo and Kyle Pitts, season usage side by side
Stat	Chig Okonkwo	Kyle Pitts
Games	3	6
Passes thrown to him
Targets	13	22
Target share	15%	14%
Air-yards share	11%	12%
Catches	8	15
Receiving yards	81	169
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	0	5
Red-zone share	0%	11%
End-zone targets	0	2
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	0	3
Expected touchdownsEst.	0.1	1.8
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	5.4	8.3
Fantasy points (PPR)	16.1	49.9
Expected points per gameEst.	6.7	6.7
Points vs expectedEst.	−1.4	+1.6

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

Chig Okonkwo
Kyle Pitts

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	Chig Okonkwo	Kyle Pitts
1	10%against PHI	5%against PIT
2	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	10%against CAR
3	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	9%against GB
4	11%against IND	15%against NO
5	26%against NYG	18%against BAL
6	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	21%against CHI

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Chig Okonkwo and Kyle Pitts
Leaderboard	Chig Okonkwo	Kyle Pitts
Target share leaders	#23of 47 tight ends	#25of 47 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders	#25of 47 tight ends	#19of 47 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)	#13of 35 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#83of 104 tight ends	#16of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders	#66of 104 tight ends	#21of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#29of 104 tight ends	#30of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Chig Okonkwo

Role up

Chig Okonkwo's target share rose to 26% in week 5 (6 targets), from 11% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5: 26%
Targets, week 5: 6
Target share, weeks 1 and 4: 11%
Targets, weeks 1 and 4: 7

Weeks 1 and 4–5 · 3 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Kyle Pitts

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Chig Okonkwo

More comparisons

Kyle Pitts

More comparisons

Compare two other players →