Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Carnell Tate vs Malik Washington

Malik Washington gets more of his team's passes (28% vs 26%), while Carnell Tate gets more of the deep throws (46% of his team's air yards vs 32%). In total, though, Carnell Tate has more targets (37 vs 36). Near the end zone, Malik Washington has had more chances (4 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 2%). Malik Washington is scoring more fantasy points a game (10.0 vs 9.7, PPR), but the chances Carnell Tate gets usually score more: 12.6 vs 12.5 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

WRTENRookie

Carnell Tate
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
9.7
Expected points per gameEst.
12.6

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Week 5 injury report: Questionable (Back)

WRMIA

Malik Washington
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.0
Expected points per gameEst.
12.5

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Carnell Tate and Malik Washington, season usage side by side
StatCarnell TateMalik Washington
Games55
Passes thrown to him
Targets3736
Target share26%28%
Air-yards share46%32%
Catches2323
Receiving yards274262
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances14
Red-zone share2%10%
End-zone targets22
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.1.01.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)9.710.0
Fantasy points (PPR)48.450.2
Expected points per gameEst.12.612.5
Points vs expectedEst.−2.5−2.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Carnell Tate
  • Malik Washington
Target share by week
WeekCarnell TateMalik Washington
121%against NYJ30%against LV
229%against PHI22%against SF
326%against NYG29%against KC
443%against BAL29%against MIN
514%against HOU31%against CIN

Next to each number: that week's opponent.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Carnell Tate and Malik Washington
LeaderboardCarnell TateMalik Washington
Target share leaders#15of 103 wide receivers#8of 103 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#4of 103 wide receivers#29of 103 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#32of 59 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#94of 180 wide receivers#40of 180 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#36of 180 wide receivers#49of 180 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#28of 180 wide receivers#29of 180 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Carnell Tate

Role down

Carnell Tate's target share fell to 14% in week 5 (5 targets), from 30% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
14%
Targets, week 5
5
Target share, weeks 1–4
30%
Targets, weeks 1–4
32

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Rookie role

Rookie Carnell Tate has a 26% target share through 5 games.

Target share
26%
Targets
37

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

Malik Washington

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Carnell Tate

More comparisons

Malik Washington

More comparisons

Compare two other players →