Usage comparison · Running backs

Bhayshul Tuten vs Pierre Strong

Bhayshul Tuten gets more of his team's runs (56% vs 31%), while Pierre Strong gets more of his team's passes (14% vs 8%). In total, though, Bhayshul Tuten has more targets (14 vs 10). Bhayshul Tuten has played 6 games and Pierre Strong 2 games. Near the end zone, Bhayshul Tuten has had more chances (19 vs 6 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (31% vs 30%). Bhayshul Tuten is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.7 vs 8.3, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 13.4 vs 12.8 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

RBJAX

Bhayshul Tuten
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.7
Expected points per gameEst.
13.4

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

RBGB

Pierre Strong
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.3
Expected points per gameEst.
12.8

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Bhayshul Tuten and Pierre Strong, season usage side by side
StatBhayshul TutenPierre Strong
Games62
Passes thrown to him
Targets1410
Target share8%14%
Catches138
Receiving yards12650
Runs
Carries9416
Carry share56%31%
Rushing yards38835
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances196
Red-zone share31%30%
Goal-line runs31
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns40
Expected touchdownsEst.3.71.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)14.78.3
Fantasy points (PPR)88.416.5
Expected points per gameEst.13.412.8
Points vs expectedEst.+1.4−4.5

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Carry share by week

Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.

  • Bhayshul Tuten
  • Pierre Strong

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Carry share by week
WeekBhayshul TutenPierre Strong
147%against CLE— no game with a target, carry or dropback
254%against DEN— no game with a target, carry or dropback
350%against NE— no game with a target, carry or dropback
463%against CIN— no game with a target, carry or dropback
581%against PHI19%against CHI
644%against HOU42%against DAL

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Bhayshul Tuten and Pierre Strong
LeaderboardBhayshul TutenPierre Strong
Carry share leaders#18of 78 running backs#44of 78 running backs
Target share leaders#36of 47 running backs#10of 47 running backs
Red-zone share leaders#20of 73 running backs#22of 73 running backs
Red-zone opportunity leaders#12of 118 running backs#50of 118 running backs
Goal-line carry leaders#24of 118 running backs#59of 118 running backs
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#20of 118 running backs#22of 118 running backs

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Bhayshul Tuten

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Pierre Strong

Role up

Pierre Strong's share of GB carries rose to 42% in week 6 (11 carries), from 19% in week 5.

Carry share, week 6
42%
Carries, week 6
11
Carry share, week 5
19%

Weeks 5–6 · 2 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring