Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Antonio Williams vs Kevin Coleman Jr.

Kevin Coleman Jr. gets more of his team's passes (16% vs 14%) and more of the deep throws (20% of its air yards vs 16%). In total, though, Antonio Williams has more targets (22 vs 17). Antonio Williams has played 5 games and Kevin Coleman Jr. 4 games. Near the end zone, they have had the same number of chances (2 plays within 20 yards), but Kevin Coleman Jr. gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (7% vs 5%). Antonio Williams is scoring more fantasy points a game (7.3 vs 3.7, PPR), but the chances Kevin Coleman Jr. gets usually score more: 7.8 vs 7.7 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

WRWASRookie

Antonio Williams
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.3
Expected points per gameEst.
7.7

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRMIARookie

Kevin Coleman Jr.
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
3.7
Expected points per gameEst.
7.8

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Antonio Williams and Kevin Coleman Jr., season usage side by side
StatAntonio WilliamsKevin Coleman Jr.
Games54
Passes thrown to him
Targets2217
Target share14%16%
Air-yards share16%20%
Catches155
Receiving yards15536
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances22
Red-zone share5%7%
End-zone targets12
Touchdowns
Touchdowns11
Expected touchdownsEst.1.01.1
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)7.33.7
Fantasy points (PPR)36.514.6
Expected points per gameEst.7.77.8
Points vs expectedEst.−0.4−4.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Antonio Williams
  • Kevin Coleman Jr.

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekAntonio WilliamsKevin Coleman Jr.
114%against PHI7%against LV
29%against DAL— no game with a target, carry or dropback
313%against SEA11%against KC
422%against IND24%against MIN
513%against NYG27%against CIN

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Antonio Williams and Kevin Coleman Jr.
LeaderboardAntonio WilliamsKevin Coleman Jr.
Target share leaders#64of 103 wide receivers#54of 103 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#77of 103 wide receivers#62of 103 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#61of 180 wide receivers#73of 180 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#60of 180 wide receivers#47of 180 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#71of 180 wide receivers#69of 180 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Antonio Williams

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Kevin Coleman Jr.

Role up

Kevin Coleman Jr.'s target share rose to 27% in week 5 (7 targets), from 13% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
27%
Targets, week 5
7
Target share, weeks 1 and 3–4
13%
Targets, weeks 1 and 3–4
10

Weeks 1 and 3–5 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring