Usage comparison · Running backs
Pierre Strong vs Rachaad White
Rachaad White gets more of his team's runs (23% vs 19%), while Pierre Strong gets more of his team's passes (13% vs 9%). In total, though, Rachaad White has more targets (10 vs 4). Pierre Strong has played 1 game and Rachaad White 4 games. Near the end zone, Rachaad White has had more chances (6 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (17% vs 13%). Rachaad White is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.3 vs 4.8, PPR), but the chances Pierre Strong gets usually score more: 8.1 vs 8.0 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026
RBGB
Pierre Strong- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 4.8
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 8.1
1 game with a target, carry or dropback
RBWAS
Rachaad White- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 8.3
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 8.0
4 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
| Stat | Pierre Strong | Rachaad White |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 4 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 4 | 10 |
| Target share | 13% | 9% |
| Catches | 3 | 10 |
| Receiving yards | 11 | 53 |
| Runs | ||
| Carries | 5 | 29 |
| Carry share | 19% | 23% |
| Rushing yards | 7 | 118 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 1 | 6 |
| Red-zone share | 13% | 17% |
| Goal-line runs | 0 | 1 |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 1 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.1 | 1.1 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 4.8 | 8.3 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 4.8 | 33.1 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 8.1 | 8.0 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | −3.3 | +0.2 |
Week by week
Carry share by week
Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.
- Pierre Strong
- Rachaad White
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Pierre Strong | Rachaad White |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 22%against PHI |
| 2 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 22%against DAL |
| 3 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 25%against SEA |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 5 | 19%against CHI | 23%against NYG |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
| Leaderboard | Pierre Strong | Rachaad White |
|---|---|---|
| Carry share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games) | #50of 70 running backs |
| Target share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | #25of 38 running backs |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #40of 63 running backs |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #88of 113 running backs | #45of 113 running backs |
| Goal-line carry leaders | #97of 113 running backs | #51of 113 running backs |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #46of 113 running backs | #47of 113 running backs |
Keep exploring
Pierre Strong
More comparisons