Usage comparison · Running backs

Kimani Vidal vs Tyjae Spears

Tyjae Spears gets more of his team's runs (16% vs 15%) and more of its passes (11% vs 9%). Kimani Vidal has played 3 games and Tyjae Spears 5 games. Near the end zone, they have had the same number of chances (2 plays within 20 yards), but Kimani Vidal gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 5%). Kimani Vidal is scoring more fantasy points a game (9.1 vs 5.1, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 6.4 vs 6.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

RBLAC

Kimani Vidal

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 9.1
Expected points per gameEst.: 6.4

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

RBTEN

Tyjae Spears

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 5.1
Expected points per gameEst.: 6.1

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Kimani Vidal and Tyjae Spears, season usage side by side
Stat	Kimani Vidal	Tyjae Spears
Games	3	5
Passes thrown to him
Targets	8	16
Target share	9%	11%
Catches	4	14
Receiving yards	24	68
Runs
Carries	14	17
Carry share	15%	16%
Rushing yards	88	65
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	2	2
Red-zone share	9%	5%
Goal-line runs	0	0
End-zone targets	0	0
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	2	0
Expected touchdownsEst.	0.3	0.2
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	9.1	5.1
Fantasy points (PPR)	27.2	25.3
Expected points per gameEst.	6.4	6.1
Points vs expectedEst.	+2.7	−0.6

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Carry share by week

Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.

Kimani Vidal
Tyjae Spears

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Carry share by week
Week	Kimani Vidal	Tyjae Spears
1	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	21%against NYJ
2	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	24%against PHI
3	4%against BUF	14%against NYG
4	16%against SEA	8%against BAL
5	24%against DEN	11%against HOU

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Kimani Vidal and Tyjae Spears
Leaderboard	Kimani Vidal	Tyjae Spears
Carry share leaders	#61of 70 running backs	#60of 70 running backs
Target share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)	#17of 38 running backs
Red-zone share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#69of 113 running backs	#74of 113 running backs
Goal-line carry leaders	#88of 113 running backs	#110of 113 running backs
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#57of 113 running backs	#59of 113 running backs

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Kimani Vidal

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Tyjae Spears

Role up

Tyjae Spears's target share rose to 26% in week 5 (9 targets), from 6% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5: 26%
Targets, week 5: 9
Target share, weeks 1–4: 6%
Targets, weeks 1–4: 7

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

Kimani Vidal

More comparisons

Tyjae Spears

More comparisons

Compare two other players →