Usage comparison · Running backs

Dameon Pierce vs Emanuel Wilson

Dameon Pierce gets more of his team's runs (61% vs 53%) and more of its passes (14% vs 5%). In total, though, Emanuel Wilson has more carries (73 vs 11) and Emanuel Wilson has more targets (7 vs 5). Dameon Pierce has played 1 game and Emanuel Wilson 5 games. Near the end zone, Emanuel Wilson has had more chances (16 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (30% vs 25%). Emanuel Wilson is scoring more fantasy points a game (10.2 vs 3.2, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 12.8 vs 12.7 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

RBPHI

Dameon Pierce
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
3.2
Expected points per gameEst.
12.7

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

RBSEA

Emanuel Wilson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.2
Expected points per gameEst.
12.8

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Dameon Pierce and Emanuel Wilson, season usage side by side
StatDameon PierceEmanuel Wilson
Games15
Passes thrown to him
Targets57
Target share14%5%
Catches25
Receiving yards−250
Runs
Carries1173
Carry share61%53%
Rushing yards14251
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances116
Red-zone share25%30%
Goal-line runs07
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns03
Expected touchdownsEst.0.14.2
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)3.210.2
Fantasy points (PPR)3.251.1
Expected points per gameEst.12.712.8
Points vs expectedEst.−9.5−2.2

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Carry share by week

Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.

  • Dameon Pierce
  • Emanuel Wilson

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Carry share by week
WeekDameon PierceEmanuel Wilson
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback9%against NE
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback53%against ARI
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback50%against WAS
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback64%against LAC
561%against JAX77%against SF

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Dameon Pierce and Emanuel Wilson
LeaderboardDameon PierceEmanuel Wilson
Carry share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games)#21of 70 running backs
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#21of 63 running backs
Red-zone opportunity leaders#82of 113 running backs#12of 113 running backs
Goal-line carry leaders#68of 113 running backs#10of 113 running backs
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#23of 113 running backs#22of 113 running backs

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Dameon Pierce

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Emanuel Wilson

Role up

Emanuel Wilson's share of SEA carries rose to 77% in week 5 (20 carries), from 47% in weeks 1-4.

Carry share, week 5
77%
Carries, week 5
20
Carry share, weeks 1–4
47%

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring