Usage comparison · Running backs

Bam Knight vs Chris Brooks

Bam Knight gets more of his team's runs (26% vs 21%), while Chris Brooks gets more of his team's passes (3% vs 2%). Bam Knight has played 3 games and Chris Brooks 4 games. Near the end zone, Chris Brooks has had more chances (6 vs 4 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (14% vs 13%). Bam Knight is scoring more fantasy points a game (5.0 vs 3.1, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 4.7 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

RBARI

Bam Knight
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.0
Expected points per gameEst.
4.7

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

RBGB

Chris Brooks
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
3.1
Expected points per gameEst.
4.7

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Bam Knight and Chris Brooks, season usage side by side
StatBam KnightChris Brooks
Games34
Passes thrown to him
Targets25
Target share2%3%
Catches23
Receiving yards1824
Runs
Carries1815
Carry share26%21%
Rushing yards11270
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances46
Red-zone share13%14%
Goal-line runs11
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.61.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)5.03.1
Fantasy points (PPR)15.012.4
Expected points per gameEst.4.74.7
Points vs expectedEst.+0.3−1.6

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Carry share by week

Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.

  • Bam Knight
  • Chris Brooks

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Carry share by week
WeekBam KnightChris Brooks
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback33%against MIN
212%against SEA22%against NYJ
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback0%against ATL
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback16%against TB
56%against DET— no game with a target, carry or dropback
643%against LA— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Bam Knight and Chris Brooks
LeaderboardBam KnightChris Brooks
Carry share leaders#50of 78 running backs#57of 78 running backs
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders#61of 73 running backs#58of 73 running backs
Red-zone opportunity leaders#57of 118 running backs#48of 118 running backs
Goal-line carry leaders#42of 118 running backs#47of 118 running backs
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#67of 118 running backs#68of 118 running backs

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Bam Knight

Role up

Bam Knight's share of ARI carries rose to 43% in week 6 (15 carries), from 9% in weeks 2-5.

Carry share, week 6
43%
Carries, week 6
15
Carry share, weeks 2 and 5
9%

Weeks 2 and 5–6 · 3 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Chris Brooks

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring