Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Running backs

Alec Ingold vs Kendre Miller

Kendre Miller gets more of his team's runs (33% vs 0%), while Alec Ingold gets more of his team's passes (12% vs 4%). In total, though, Kendre Miller has more targets (6 vs 4). Alec Ingold has played 1 game and Kendre Miller 4 games. Near the end zone, Kendre Miller has had more chances (7 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (18% vs 7%). Alec Ingold is scoring more fantasy points a game (6.5 vs 6.0, PPR), but the chances Kendre Miller gets usually score more: 7.4 vs 7.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

RBLAC

Alec Ingold
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
6.5
Expected points per gameEst.
7.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

RBNO

Kendre Miller
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
6.0
Expected points per gameEst.
7.4

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Alec Ingold and Kendre Miller, season usage side by side
StatAlec IngoldKendre Miller
Games14
Passes thrown to him
Targets46
Target share12%4%
Catches34
Receiving yards3515
Runs
Carries029
Carry share0%33%
Rushing yards083
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances17
Red-zone share7%18%
Goal-line runs02
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns02
Expected touchdownsEst.0.31.6
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)6.56.0
Fantasy points (PPR)6.523.8
Expected points per gameEst.7.27.4
Points vs expectedEst.−0.7−0.9

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Carry share by week

Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.

  • Alec Ingold
  • Kendre Miller

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Carry share by week
WeekAlec IngoldKendre Miller
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback36%against DET
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
30%against BUF14%against LV
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback32%against ATL
5— no game with a target, carry or dropback59%against MIN

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Alec Ingold and Kendre Miller
LeaderboardAlec IngoldKendre Miller
Carry share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games)#41of 70 running backs
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#39of 63 running backs
Red-zone opportunity leaders#77of 113 running backs#40of 113 running backs
Goal-line carry leaders#57of 113 running backs#31of 113 running backs
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#52of 113 running backs#51of 113 running backs

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Alec Ingold

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Kendre Miller

Role up

Kendre Miller's share of NO carries rose to 59% in week 5 (10 carries), from 26% in weeks 1-4.

Carry share, week 5
59%
Carries, week 5
10
Carry share, weeks 1 and 3–4
26%

Weeks 1 and 3–5 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

Alec Ingold

More comparisons

Kendre Miller

More comparisons

Compare two other players →