Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Running backs

Alec Ingold vs Keaton Mitchell

Keaton Mitchell gets more of the Chargers' runs (24% vs 0%), while Alec Ingold gets more of the Chargers' passes (12% vs 9%). In total, though, Keaton Mitchell has more targets (10 vs 4). Alec Ingold has played 1 game and Keaton Mitchell 4 games. Near the end zone, Keaton Mitchell has had more chances (4 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of the Chargers' chances there (11% vs 7%). Keaton Mitchell is scoring more fantasy points a game (7.7 vs 6.5, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 7.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

RBLAC

Alec Ingold
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
6.5
Expected points per gameEst.
7.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

RBLAC

Keaton Mitchell
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.7
Expected points per gameEst.
7.2

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Alec Ingold and Keaton Mitchell, season usage side by side
StatAlec IngoldKeaton Mitchell
Games14
Passes thrown to him
Targets410
Target share12%9%
Catches39
Receiving yards3534
Runs
Carries027
Carry share0%24%
Rushing yards0124
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances14
Red-zone share7%11%
Goal-line runs00
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns01
Expected touchdownsEst.0.30.7
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)6.57.7
Fantasy points (PPR)6.530.8
Expected points per gameEst.7.27.2
Points vs expectedEst.−0.7+0.5

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Carry share by week

Out of all his team's runs in his games, the part he got.

  • Alec Ingold
  • Keaton Mitchell

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Carry share by week
WeekAlec IngoldKeaton Mitchell
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback19%against ARI
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback16%against LV
30%against BUF29%against BUF
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback31%against SEA

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Alec Ingold and Keaton Mitchell
LeaderboardAlec IngoldKeaton Mitchell
Carry share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 carries in at least 2 games)#49of 66 running backs
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#25of 28 running backs
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#51of 55 running backs
Red-zone opportunity leaders#74of 108 running backs#48of 108 running backs
Goal-line carry leaders#51of 108 running backs#80of 108 running backs
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#46of 108 running backs#48of 108 running backs

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Alec Ingold

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keaton Mitchell

Role up

Keaton Mitchell's target share rose to 19% in week 4 (6 targets), from 5% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
19%
Targets, week 4
6
Target share, weeks 1–3
5%
Targets, weeks 1–3
4

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

Alec Ingold

More comparisons

Keaton Mitchell

More comparisons

Compare two other players →